Well, some email has rolled in, given the tenor of the
next-to-last post. So, I thought I’d sit down and try to see what’s changed with me in the
past year or so.
First though, I have some BIG news – I’ll be shipped out of
my old division to a new one soon. That
means a new judge, new clients, new types of cases (basically the old crimes
cases with the addition of traffic cases), and a new trial partner(s).
Most important, my clients will be OUT OF JAIL!!! That changes everything – for example, a
defense continuance no longer means several weeks of my client eating bad food,
wearing an orange jumpsuit, being crowed into unsanitary, insanely loud,
constantly lit, and freezing concrete and metal surroundings, while being separated
from his family, simply so his attorney can get something crucial squared
away.
Yea! (that deserves
its own paragraph.)
In other changes, my Mental Health client load will be nearly
non-existent by comparison, giving me more time to focus on that. I’ll be actually in the office (instead of in
court) during regular business hours. So
I’ll be taking more depos, and doing a different kind of investigatory work. I also expect my motions practice to pick up,
which could be interesting since that used to be one of my strengths before I
began work in my “they’re-in-jail, just-try-it” division. My workload is probably also going to drop,
in the sense that I won’t be pulling 7am to 9:30pm days (as I did this past Thursday).
Outside of the court room, this means I’ll be able to be
more in Miami itself (during daylight hours) and take care of some personal
things that have been on the back burner during my stint in my soon-to-be-old
division. (No more vacation days burned
on getting my student loans in order!)
Or so rumor has it. I
haven’t gotten official word as I was in trial (post below) when the news was
announced.
I’ll be sad to leave my current courtroom(s) and my trial
partners. Given the staffing travails
we’ve undergone, what with people leaving and being sick and coming on to be
trained, it’s sort of the worst time to leave, from my selfish
perspective. Since we’re just now
cruising at full strength I want to keep the pressure on the state (This has
resulted in 4 jury trials in 2 weeks, to say nothing of the 2 cases the state
nolle prossed last-minute before picking a jury, with our client dressed in a
suit and sitting at our table!)
However, its also perhaps the best time to be moved, since
things are working well. I told my mom fighting
the state was like keeping your hands around the closed jaws of a snake – you don’t
want to let go until you’re sure the next person has a firm grip.
I have *every* confidence in my trial partners – I just wish
we had more time to develop even more strategies together, since we have
changed how we found our division in pretty significant ways. In fact, just today, I was reviewing some old
materials and came across a note written by one of my partners that said “Go on
X, not Y.” I had asked him to research a
last minute issue that would determine how we’d attack one particular argument
the state was going to be making. We had
only the most minor of opportunities to discuss it (trials are fluid
things). I was busy with other trial
issues, so he just handed me the note, right before the issue was ripe. And so I stood up and did my thing, fully
trusting that my partner had framed the issue correctly and was going to be
able to back me up on it. He had, and we
won pretty convincingly. It takes awhile
for me to develop that level of trust with people, and I’m going to miss having
both my partners at my side.
I’ll only be across the hallway though, so I’ll be able to
pitch in as required, certainly with the daily heavy lifting if someone’s sick
or ill.
I’ll also be sad to leave my judges – the 3 regular judges I’ve
had, plus the recurring covering judges we get from time to time. I felt I could work with all of them –
although each of them has their own unique style, and none would ever mistake
one for the others.
I’m wondering how different things will be with my new
judge. I know that the protocols of that
courtroom are different (more formal), which might even be something of a
welcome change. I’m getting very
colloquial in my practice – I almost addressed a judge as “Judge” the other
day, instead of “Your Honor”. Seems like
a small thing I know, but it’s emblematic of what I don’t always think is an
appropriate relaxation on my part. I’ve
heard very good things about the new judge, and already have some expectations
about what kinds of things I’ll be able to do in that particular courtroom (as
opposed to being in *any* courtroom with less clients, daily drama, and more
time to get truly creative with my practice).
I think the funniest thing is the new judge’s demeanor on
the bench, which has drawn both praise and criticism from the various and
sundry defendants, witnesses, courtroom personnel, advocates and
attorneys. I told my mom the good and
the bad on the phone yesterday and she started laughing, “But Scoplaw, that’s
YOU!” And not-quite-sadly, I had to
agree. So it should be an interesting
ride, given that I don’t always respond to myself well.
**
As far as what’s changed with me in the past year, I think there
are a number of lines anyone can draw in their life – significant events which
change the daily tenor of what we do, or even, how we do. But such lines are never nearly as clean as
we subsequently pretend them to be. So
with that in mind, I’m drawing a line about 9 months ago, although what
happened just before and just after make it a broad fuzzy line.
About 9 months ago, I moved to FL – not knowing more than
two people in the entire state south of Orlando. That whole surrounding period, from May to
August, was pretty momentous: the final dissolution of what had been a very
important relationship, graduating law school, leaving DC (which on some level
I still love, and with which I had a good life), studying for the bar, taking
that exam, taking on new and very important responsibilities in a strange place,
wherein I didn’t know the local lingo and customs. All in all, it was a story about moving from
the familiar to the unfamiliar, about relying on what I knew, and trying to
make new things happen.
Basically, as soon as I arrived, my work took over my
life. However, even early on, I was able
to get a lot of things done that I wanted to, and the degree to which my work
has impacted my free time has only changed for the better, albeit slowly. So, yes, I still do the very Scoplawic
hunting through junkstores, visiting libraries, watching movies, reading books,
writing poetry, buying and cooking food, building and riding bikes, socializing
with interesting people – but all these not as much, and all these somewhat more
desperately snatched from the mundanities of dishes and laundry and vacuuming and
getting suits and shoes and self ready for court each day. However, a good deal of “moving to a new
place/starting a new profession” things are simply done by now – no more bar
exam/character and fitness review to eat up my weekends, no more trying to find
adequate local suppliers of avocados and bicycle parts.
What I haven’t been able to do is take on any significant
new learning (I had fantasizes of resuscitating my Spanish), although I have
picked up a few things here and there, as I’m wont to. I’m also not sure I’ve had enough reflective
time to really come to grips with all the changes that happened in my life in
that last bit in DC phase. I know I
have, and that it’s mostly done. I’m not
sure it’s entirely done or not. Which is
part of the problem of not having enough reflective time - these things have to
be tracked, not thought about once or twice.
The really significant learning/growth has come mostly from
courtroom/trial experience, as well as from rapidly moving through a lot of
clients.
The office down here was tremendous in as far as it gave me
both training and discretion to do what I thought I could for my clients. After an August shadowing a truly exceptional
felony attorney, and a crash course (self-taught) in FL crim law/procedure, I
was moved into the most frenetic division in county court. At first the workload was overwhelming, as
was the feeling that I just didn’t know what the hell I was doing. I was able to keep going though, largely
because I knew that Law School, whatever it was, wasn’t interested in teaching
and drilling the skills you need to succeed in a courtroom. Of course, Law School, especially the clinic,
was invaluable in actually getting me ready for the job as well – just not
always in the most obvious ways. I have
to say there’s no way in hell I’d have done the job well without my clinical
experience. The summer internships were
crucial, but the clinic gave me a way to personally contextualize the
abstractions of the law into actual client representation; it taught me about
practice and set me in motion.
So, after a relatively slow start in terms of trials, I’ve
been able to get my feet under me and get some stuff done. I have my favorite moments (and some never to
be repeated arguments) and on the whole, I think it’s been a tremendously great
experience, no matter how much I whine about FL as a cultural wasteland.
I’m *much* more comfortable in a courtroom, even in front of
a (literally) red-faced and shouting judge. I feel I have some grasp of both trail strategy and technique. I’m at least becoming somewhat acquainted
with the rules of evidence in a practical way. (There’s an analogy to be made between literature academics in relation
to poets, and appellate lawyers/law academics in relation to trial
attorneys. You tend to use the same
rules/information differently, and one seldom appreciates the other’s efforts.)
All in all, in the past 9 months, I’ve been to jury trial
about 16 times? plus another 4 or so dispositive motions where witnesses were
called and crossed. We’ve had probably
twice that number of near misses (cases we’re completely ready on), ranging
from nolle prosses early on during trial day, to (more rarely) ones given in
the middle of actually picking the small panel. If we considered the number of cases the state declared ready on at the
day of trial, which we then discovered had fatal flaws, turned over our cards,
and got the state to drop the charges, I’d guess it would be about 60 or
so. I’d also have to guess we’ve had well
over 10 motions to dismiss (no witnesses called) granted by the judges as
well. (Oddly, I don’t remember the wins
all that well. I do remember each Guilty
verdict quite clearly though – there are 4 of them, 3 single counts and one
split.)
The backdrop to this is about 1500 clients (just me
personally, not my division) the vast vast majority of whom are offered and
take credit-time-served sentences, with or without a formal finding of
adjudication, at one point or another.
I’m not sure I could have done this in any other office in
the country. I mean, anecdotally, I
think my experience has been unusual. It’s certainly subjectively recent to me in odd ways. Someone asked me (questionnaire) what my
profession was. I said “attorney” – but
it felt kind of weird to say, like I was still pretending at it or something.
Anyway you slice it, it’s a tremendous amount of courtroom
experience to digest – and I’m sure I haven’t done so as well as I ideally
might. And that, in effect, is what’s
been largely occupying my brain for the past nine months. There are a lot of things I haven’t yet done,
but I think I’ve gotten a tremendous exposure to trial practice, plus a
sampling of the more random scenarios and unusual hearings.
So, I’m largely the same, everything’s still there. I’m just working with a different focus at a
different level of intensity. I may not
have as much time to write long posts about poetics, but for now I must leave
that to others, without very much regret.
Or not, depending on what happens with the new
division.
Recent Comments